BREAKING: US Security Engineering Officer Blows Whistle on Potential Multi-Million Dollar Fraud
State Department Veteran Claims “Forgery” of His Signature on Government Compliance Records Pertinent to National Security
Reporter (Catherine Herridge): “Is this government testing record a smoking gun?”
Whistleblower: “I believe it is.”
Reporter: “Who would have the authority to remove references to directed energy exposure?”
Whistleblower: “The State Department and CIA.”
Reporter: “Why was the intelligence withheld?”
Whistleblower: “It gets to the heart of the U.S. government always trying to minimize any potential directed energy attack.”
Reporter: “You’ve exclusively shared this record with us. Is that your signature?”
Whistleblower: “No, it is not.”
Reporter: “Are you alleging fraud with a government contract?”
Whistleblower: “Yes, I am.”
Reporter: “What is the cost of coming forward?”
Whistleblower: “The cost for me has been not only financial but has been profound in terms of my career. When I see that, I see the U.S. government doing the worst of the worst, putting pressure on me to be quiet using my kids, using my wife, and that is the worst. That’s beyond reprehensible, in a very Soviet way.”
Reporter: “Was anyone authorized to sign for you?”
Whistleblower: “No.”
Reporter: “How large is this State Department contract?”
Whistleblower: “This particular contract is a $5 million, what we call a TSU, a Technical Security Upgrade, but for $5 million, yes.”
Reporter: “Is this an isolated case?”
Whistleblower: “It’s actually not. Every State Department Foreign Service Officer like myself knows of instances like this where fraud has been committed at the Department of State, and that’s why I fully support DOGE’s efforts to root out that fraud, waste, and abuse.”
Reporter: “The worst thing you can do at the State Department is praise President Trump and expose fraud, waste, and abuse. You’re going to be retaliated against.”
Whistleblower: “Yes, that’s correct.”
Reporter: “You said you should have been among the first to know. How can that be?”
Whistleblower: “That’s because they don’t want to know. They want to have plausible deniability.”
Reporter: “Was the American embassy under attack?”
Whistleblower: “My job is to take data and send that back to Washington to determine if it’s under attack or not. I was told to take that data out. We don’t even want to deal with that.”
Reporter: “Is that a violation of State Department regulations?”
Whistleblower: “Completely. There’s a question in there, in your engineering judgment, how long has this existed? And I said, for years, potentially. And that’s what Washington wanted me to remove.”
Reporter: “You were recently retaliated against and ordered to leave Helsinki?”
Whistleblower: “Yes, uproot my family and disrupt therapy for my children.”
Reporter: “Did the State Department test your children?”
Whistleblower: “No, they did not.”
Reporter: “What goes through your head when you read this assessment of your son?”
Whistleblower: “I signed up for this job to go up against Vladimir Putin. My kids and my wife did not sign up for this. I wrestle with this all the time. My biggest fear is that my wife and I will get early onset Parkinson’s, and we won’t be there for our kids with their health issues.”
Reporter: “Is this a leverage point for President Trump?”
Whistleblower: “It is a leverage point. I have faith that President Trump, after this report, will have a leverage point and that he’ll use that.”